Delays caused by the replacement of a panel reviewing the Energy East Pipeline project show that Canada's regulatory system is flawed and must be fixed, says a former CEO of proponent TransCanada.
Hal Kvisle said Thursday the recusal of a National Energy Board panel in early September just after hearings on the controversial project began was a victory for activists whose only objective is to block the process.
"I think it's another failure of (the) regulatory process in Canada that we can't even commence a regulatory process without it coming off the rails," he said in an interview with The Canadian Press.
"It's regrettable. I've been making the point to the government of Canada for about 12 or 13 years there needs to be significant improvements in the regulatory process and here we're just had it thrown in the ditch again by people whose objective is really just to stop the whole thing."
The NEB's review broke down after hearings in Montreal were disrupted by protesters. Critics charged the panel was biased National Observer reported that two of three panelists met last year with former Quebec premier Jean Charest, then a consultant for TransCanada (TSX:TRP).
At that meeting, Charest gave political advice to the panelists about how to gain public support in Quebec for pipelines.
Kvisle, who spoke on the sidelines of the Global Business Forum in Banff, Alta., says the controversy was a "tempest in a teapot," pointing out the panellists also met with other interested parties. He retired from the top job at TransCanada in 2010.
TransCanada has repeatedly declined to answer questions about whether any of its employees were aware about the meeting before it occurred.
Natural Resources Minister Jim Carr has said new panellists will be appointed as soon as possible but the review period could be delayed, as could the NEB's goal of having a decision on Energy East by March 18, 2018. The new panel is to decide how the review will proceed and whether evidence will need to be heard again.
The 4,500-kilometre pipeline would cost $15.7 billion and carry 1.1 million barrels of oil per day from Alberta to New Brunswick. About two-thirds is already in place as a natural gas pipeline.
Meanwhile, Kinder Morgan Canada president Ian Anderson says he's optimistic his company's controversial Trans Mountain Pipeline expansion will be approved by December as scheduled after the federal government green-lighted the Pacific NorthWest LNG project on Tuesday.
"It signals one thing: The federal government is prepared to make some difficult decisions and I think they've made one on that file," said Anderson in an interview at the Banff conference.
The liquefied natural gas project would include the construction of an $11 billion export terminal in northern B.C., expected to produce about 19.2 million tonnes of LNG per year at full capacity. Its proponents have not yet approved its construction.
Trans Mountain, a $6.8 billion Alberta-to-B.C. pipeline expansion, was conditionally approved by the NEB last spring but still requires government approval to proceed.
with files from National Observer
Comments
"here we're just had it thrown in the ditch again by people whose objective is really just to stop the whole thing."
Self-interest, much?
No, Mr. Kvisle, the so-called regulatory process was already well under way towards the usual rubber stamp of approval, and it was actually thrown in the ditch by the revelations that the "impartial" regulators were actually snuggled up in bed with the proponents.
All that concerned citizens needed to do - and hats off to the Nat Obs for leading the charge! - was to make that truth public, and then the whole sham process came off the rails all by itself. We all got to see the little man pulling the strings behind the curtain, pretending to be the Wizard.
And what we need to move forward now is more - not fewer - revelations of how the so-called regulators are actually the paid bed-partners of those they are supposed to be regulating in the public interest. This is just the beginning (I hope).
Are you listening, Health Canada? You'd better be, because you're next.