Skip to main content

What's on your plate could make the difference in climate crisis

#28 of 228 articles from the Special Report: Food Insider
Food waste was responsible for roughly seven per cent of Canada's greenhouse gas emissions in 2018. Reducing these emissions is essential if humans are to keep global warming within a safe limit. Photo by Tim Jewett/Wikimedia Commons

Support strong Canadian climate journalism for 2025

Help us raise $150,000 by December 31. Can we count on your support?
Goal: $150k
$32k

Food could be a key in slowing climate change — if we change everything from how it’s grown, to what rots in our fridges.

The path of food from farm to fork and beyond is responsible for between 21 and 37 per cent of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions worldwide, a new report says.

The report, published last week by the UN Environment Program and three environmental organizations, found that transforming how we grow, eat and dispose of food could significantly reduce these emissions, but most countries have overlooked two key tactics: reducing food waste and changing diets.

“Food systems sit in a really interesting place,” said Sophia Murphy, a food systems and international economy expert with the International Institute for Sustainable Development.

“There are many aspects of the food system that are exacerbating climate change — and it’s somewhere we can do something to reduce emissions.”

If humans continue producing, eating and wasting food as we currently do, global food systems emissions are projected to almost double by 2050 — single-handedly putting us above the 1.5 C “safe” limit to global warming.

“There are many aspects of the #foodsystem that are exacerbating #climatechange — and it’s somewhere we can do something to reduce #emissions.” @foodresilience
How humans eat over the next thirty years will have a major impact on global emissions. Healthy, low-carbon diets, reduced food waste and sustainable agriculture could provide up to 20 per cent of the greenhouse gas emission reductions needed to stay within 1.5°C of warming. Graph by Falk et al. in Loken, B./EAT

Warming above this threshold will have devastating consequences — more intense fires, droughts, floods, hurricanes and pandemics — with severe ecological and social repercussions.

Agriculture is Canada’s sixth-largest emitter of GHGs, with 87 per cent of these emissions going to crop and animal production in 2019, according to Statistics Canada. Household emissions accounted for roughly 19 per cent of the country’s total emissions in 2015.

And the 35.5 million tonnes of food waste Canadians generate each year produce about 56.5 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent (the standard measure for greenhouse gases), according to a 2019 report by Second Harvest, an organization advocating for food waste reductions.

Eliminating carbon-intensive agriculture and land uses could reduce global emissions by 7.2 billion tons of CO2 equivalent a year — enough to charge 918 million smartphones, according to the U.S. EPA.

Crop and animal production are the two largest emitters of greenhouse gases in Canada's food system — but they aren't alone. Food waste and diet changes could also significantly reduce emissions. Graph by Statistics Canada.

And reducing food waste and changing diets could reduce emissions by another 1.8 gigatons a year, the report notes. Combined, that’s enough to deliver 20 per cent of the global mitigation needed to keep global heating below 1.5 C, the number agreed upon in the 2015 Paris Agreement.

But most countries aren’t taking these steps, according to the plans they submitted to the UN under the 2015 pact.

“While many countries mention the agriculture sector in their (emissions reductions plans),” the UNEP report notes, “only 11 countries mention food loss in their (plans) and not one country makes reference to food waste.”

That includes Canada — at least for now.

The federal government has committed roughly $5.5 billion to emissions reductions programs in Canada’s agricultural sector, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada wrote in an email.

In contrast, only $184 million has been committed to reducing food waste. Most of that funding will support the Food Policy for Canada, a plan to reform Canada’s food system, launched last year.

It's a start, and one that could hold hope if it’s pursued further.

“There are many ways to produce food, and they all have different implications,” Murphy, the food systems expert, said

The question is, which ones will we choose?

Marc Fawcett-Atkinson / Local Journalism Initiative / Canada's National Observer

Comments