Skip to main content

Anti-glyphosate camps pop up in Nova Scotia forests while spraying is underway

Ten camps are now in place against glyphosate spraying in the province. Photo submitted by Don't Spray Us! Nova Scotia

Support strong Canadian climate journalism for 2025

Help us raise $150,000 by December 31. Can we count on your support?
Goal: $150k
$32k

Yearly glyphosate spraying has begun in Nova Scotia, and with it, groups of residents are setting up opposition camps against herbicide spraying in the province’s forests.

As of Wednesday, protesters are camped out around or on 10 aerial herbicide spray sites in the province, adding to a smaller number of occupations that have existed since Sept. 1. Glyphosate sprays in Nova Scotia have been cancelled in the past after efforts from the group leading the camps, Don’t Spray! Nova Scotia.

Glyphosate-based herbicide spraying is common in the forestry industry, with companies using it to kill vegetation that competes with the softwood trees they harvest.

Brandon Appleton is among the protesters and says the Digby site he is at has received ample support from community members.

“I am camped out next to a spray site here in Bear River because I am absolutely not willing to let a helicopter come in and spray poison in our community,” he said.

As of Wednesday, protesters are camped out around or on 10 aerial herbicide spray sites in N.S., adding to a smaller number of occupations that have been up since Sept. 1.

“This is a place for families to grow, for gardens to thrive; this is my home…”

Don't Spray! campers in Nova Scotia. Photo submitted

Glyphosate use is being phased out in Europe, which will ban the product come December. However, Canada’s federal government continues to approve its use, most recently in January 2019.

In 2018, international concern about glyphosate shot up when a U.S. groundskeeper who worked with the product won a lawsuit against Monsanto after his doctors testified the herbicide likely caused his terminal cancer. The verdict brought previously unseen Monsanto documents to light, which the judge said proved the company knew its products were “dangerous.”

The province’s Environment and Climate Change Department said companies using glyphosate have to follow rules that “ensure safe use” and that Health Canada has evaluated glyphosate “twice in recent years and found it to be acceptable when used according to the label.”

“Our role is to issue the approvals for its use in the province, conduct audits to ensure full compliance for safe application, and notify municipalities and First Nations when pesticide approvals have been issued for sites in their communities,” said the department.

Don’t Spray Us! said both Kings and Annapolis municipal councils have agreed to ask the province for a moratorium on all future aerial glyphosate spraying in the province — even though they don’t have jurisdiction, they hope pressure will be helpful for the cause. This year, the province approved 2,306 hectares for spraying by ARF Enterprises Inc., J.D. Irving Ltd., and Wagner Forest NS Ltd. For reference, one hectare is around 2.5 football fields in size. The “proposed time frame” from the province goes until Sept. 30, but approvals don’t expire until Dec. 31.

Spraying also occurs in other areas of Canada. In nearby New Brunswick, citizen groups such as Stop Spraying NB campaign for glyphosate-spraying bans, and Indigenous leaders have spoken out against the chemical, saying it harms human health and impacts traditional food and medicine sources.

Andrée-Anne Bédard of Baxter’s Harbour says the regulations governing spraying are not being followed. She wasn’t given adequate notice that glyphosate spraying was approved closer than 500 metres from her property. That spray was ultimately cancelled by the government, but Bédard wonders if there were other cases where people weren’t notified of spraying close to their homes.

“It was not an easy or a transparent process to find the facts, and then [the province] was willing to make a deal with ARF [the company] to change their spray boundaries. They should be fining companies that fail to follow their safety regulations, not making deals,” she said.

“In the end, the landowner decided to hire people with saws instead of spraying. So there is an alternative. This aerial spraying should not be allowed.”

Comments