So, you want to buy an electric car? If you live in Vancouver, good luck with that. Expect to get in line and wait a very long time unless you can afford to pay far more than you hoped or expected.
There’s a racket being run at auto dealerships that might get you an electric vehicle sooner than the current two-year wait cited for many mid-sized, longer-range vehicles. But only if you are willing to stretch your wallet for the fully loaded model and other financing conditions that will push the cost well past an already daunting list price.
My husband and I recently got the rundown from an honest salesperson at a dealership I won’t name, for obvious reasons. In relating our experience to friends, I have heard this is something that is happening at other dealerships as well.
We own an aging Subaru that still runs fairly well most days. But as my husband Mike likes to say, any car in the back half of its life is going to start to cost you.
Ours has admirably supported that theory; over the last few years, it has rewarded our loyalty with alternator troubles, failing suspension components and a routine water pump and timing belt replacement. But the last straw was a broken turbocharger pipe that shot exhaust inside the car, driving home the very nature of gas-powered vehicles, which are, at their core, disgusting polluters.
We fixed the car and it’s running well, for now. But knowing something else will inevitably conk out soon, we started to shop for a new vehicle. We decided the next one should be fully electric. At the top of our list were the Hyundai Ioniq, Kia EV6, Volkswagen id.4 and Subaru Solterra.
We have our eye on those because they have a longer range than many of the smaller EVs and can fit our leggy poodle-cross in the back. We didn’t consider a Tesla, which might be more readily available because of the cost and … Elon.
All of the four we are considering, we were told, had two-year waits, at least for the base models. Our honest salesperson was upfront about that. He explained manufacturers are making and shipping the top-line models first and he had no idea when the stripped-down versions would start to arrive.
If we were in a real rush, he said, we could probably get a fully loaded model sooner, with conditions.
First, he said, we had to finance our new car through the dealership, which means paying a minimum of six months interest. We weren’t thrilled about that, but we were even less thrilled by the second caveat: we had to throw in our old car as a trade-in.
Here’s where our man’s honest side really kicked in. The dealership would give us $1,200 for our 2009 accident-free Subaru, which has lower-than-average mileage and has been well-maintained. When we asked what we could expect selling privately, he told us the truth: about $9,000.
We started to do the math, and it wasn’t pretty. All of these cars sell for upward of $45,000, which already seems high to us. Then add another $8,000 for the souped-up model, $7,800 lost in the trade-in and interest payments of about $2,000, and we were looking at upwards of $15,000 to jump the queue.
We thanked him for the information and grumbled all the way home. For the record, we will not be sucked into an upgrade. The base models are more than fancy enough for us, and none of these vehicles is remotely cheap.
If we do ever buy an EV, it will be the first new car ever for us, and we’re already reeling from the sticker shock. The government rebates — on these models, $5,000 from the feds and $4,000 from B.C. — definitely sweeten the pot, but we’re hearing the cost of some of them are going up next year by amounts that may price them out of full subsidy range. We don’t know for sure, but given the economic times, it seems likely.
Meanwhile, we’ll keep sinking more money into repairing the old Subaru while unhappily filling it with gas and biking around town when possible. It’s not our first choice. But right here, right now, the array of options normally available to Canadians is scant, and there is nothing to do but wait.
Comments
Don't come to Cold Lake AB, no charging stations
Very sorry to hear that. I'm surprised that you did not consider a Chevrolet Bolt. If you can get one, it is significantly cheaper than the models you considered. We have driven one for the last four years and put 130,000 km on it. When I bought it, I have to put $1,000 down, buy it sight unseen, and get myself down to Vancouver, a 1400 km trip from where we live. The car is serving us well with a range of 350 km in the summer and 250 km in the winter. It has saved us more than $15,000 in fuel and maintenance costs so far. And Chevrolet replaced our battery, free of charge and with a new warranty, when they recalled all the Bolts.
Ho! sweetheart, you’re so pure and holy.
Be careful about your devotion,
…Hyundai Ioniq, Kia EV6, Volkswagen id.4 and Subaru Solterra. …
Should you not have a closer look at these manufacturers?
Child workers at Hyundai and Kia.
Volkswagen that lied to the whole world about their clean diesel, remember Dieselgate. VW just kicked out Herbert Diess, a CEO who seriously wanted to turn to EV but their Board of Directors decided that they wanted to pollute us as long as they can until the last drop with their diesel and gas engines.
There are only two genuine electric car manufacturers in the world, Tesla and BYD. All the others are in it because they have to, by regulations, and have to be dragged by the hair to join the electric club and are lobbying to undermine the transition to electrification of transports.
Making an EV prototype is easy, but production is hell. Tesla learned it the hard way, but it is at the top now and very profitable.
Please listen to Elon Musk HIMSELF when he talks, and see how all his actions relate to his ultimate mission of 'accelerating the transition to a sustainable future for humanity', make your own opinion instead of peddling what the ‘médias menteurs’ are telling about him. As a subscriber to N.O. I need to read articles that help to think clearly about his mission. I don’t like what N.O. is writing about him, it is grotesque and ignorant. You can do better.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TGhW6ANHxAg&t=299s
Most people do not know Tesla, because Tesla makes no publicity, just word-of-mouth of satisfied customers, just like National Observer N.O.
Most of the time the only information people hear about Tesla and Elon Musk come from the ‘hatestream’ media that only report FUD and rarely publish anything about all the good stuff. You don’t get to be the best EV with the best charging stations in the world with goofy ideas like National Observer thinks EM is capable of like this ignorant hater at N.O. who’s making fun of EM and use him as a punching bag.
Have a road test in a Tesla and see the future. Elon Musk is the one who made electrification of transportation possible on a large scale. The only other company that can match this progress is BYD.
https://www.tesla.com/en_ca/energy
Children as young as 12 found working for Hyundai/Kia in the U.S.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_EiBtVU57Fs&t=1s
Daniel - could you make your point without derision?
Musk's contribution to getting EVs rolling unfortunately doesn't mean he isn't dangerous. The link you provided shows some of his good side and I'm not arguing with that. But we don't need any particular media analysis to see how he is dangerous; he tweets it out himself.
Paul
Paul - I expect more from my subscription to N.O.
I follow Elon Musk since 2012 when I stopped buying anything running with fuel and I don't know what you are talking about.
What confuses people is his brutal honesty and transparency. We are not used to see billionaires making their money by doing good for the humanity, some people might find it very disturbing when looking at themselves in the mirror.
He never attacks anyone first. EM does things for the right reasons with an obsession for the truth.
Speaking of danger, I am more concerned by journalists doxxing his position with ill intents.
Please listen to him personally instead of peddling the noise coming from the media around EM and Tesla.
I am used to derision coming from commentators but when it comes from a journalist working for an independent media like N.O. which I like reading normally, I find it very ignorant and grotesque.
A journalist should be going deeper than just googling a subject and peddling FUD.