Opinion

The Site C Dam is out of tune with Canada's new reality. It is yesterday’s project, write two doctors, concerned about the health of British Columbians and their environment.

The fate of two of British Columbia’s most iconic animals and the ecosystems and economies that depend on them rests in our hands, writes famed Canadian scientist David Suzuki.

The bottom line is we need to change our driving, shipping and commuting habits, write two senators on the Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources.

In order to move forward, we need to have real reconciliation accompanied by restitution, writes activist Katsi’tsakwas Ellen Gabriel.

It’s hard to square $500 million for a July 1 party with a $53.8 million-investment in stopping the crisis of MMIWG, writes former Vancouver police detective Lorimer Shenher.

La loi C-44 et son projet de Banque d'infrastructure du Canada sont une menace pour l'autonomie juridique des provinces et municipalités, écrit chroniqueur Gérard Montpetit.

It’s time to choose, and choose not for the past, but for the future, write two members of the Canadian Association of Physicians for the Environment.

Nature can help us — if we let it, writes renowned Canadian TV show host, scientist and environmental activist David Suzuki.

An unfortunate legacy of the Harper era is that public officials and media often conflate Indigenous peoples’ right to consent with veto power.

The new process for picking a CBC board is an important first step in rebuilding and reviving the public broadcaster, says former longtime CBC journalist Nick Fillmore.

We have spent 20 years negotiating. Now it is time for action and the world's priority is implementation.

Two hundred years ago this month, an environmental and fuel crisis inspired one of our greatest inventions.

Der Spiegel stands by report suggesting Prime Minister Justin Trudeau appeased U.S. President Donald Trump regarding removal of mention of the Paris climate agreement from declaration.

A parliamentary committee's proposed update of federal law to greatly improve protection against toxic substances is long overdue, says Liberal MP William Amos.

Under existing law, those who want to restrict use of a chemical must prove harm to humans or the environment. This is fundamentally backwards.